On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:23:15 +0200 Maurus Cuelenaere <mcuelenaere@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Op 15-07-10 20:52, Andrew Morton schreef: > > On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 02:05:45 +0200 > > Maurus Cuelenaere <mcuelenaere@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> This patch adds a simple algorithm which calculates the pixel clock based on the > >> video mode parameters. This is only done when no pixel clock is supplied through > >> the platform data. > >> > > So.. we are to assume that there's a platform which doesn't provide > > the pixel clock data? Adding some information about that in the > > changelog would have been useful. > > Not exactly, this allows you to omit the pixel clock data and thus sharing the > "algo" used for calculating it; which is done in another patch (not submitted to > linux-fbdev, see [1]). > > [1] - http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg02086.html > That means that there's no reason to merge this patch! So I merged "arm: samsung: remove pixclock from several boards" as well ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |