Re: About SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:53:24AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> yet another _very easy_ solution is, define pfn_valid() as following.

We have a perfectly good and efficient pfn_valid() implementation which'll
work no matter what memory model is chosen - we don't need to invent other
solutions.  But as sparsemem always provides its own pfn_valid() and is
not overridable...

Maybe the answer _is_ to make it overridable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux