On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:25:33PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > On 28/06/10 12:28, Maurus Cuelenaere wrote: > > No need for the '? 1 : 0' > I tihnk there is, IIRC there is no neccessity for a compiler to produce > one for true, just that the result be !0 The compiler will *produce* 1 for true, but it will accept any non-zero value as true. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |