Jeff Garzik wrote: > > On 06/14/2010 03:07 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > From: Abhilash Kesavan<a.kesavan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Adds support for the Samsung PATA controller. This driver is based on the > > Libata subsystem and references the earlier patches sent for IDE subsystem. > > > > Signed-off-by: Abhilash Kesavan<a.kesavan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim<kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Send it through the appropriate subsystem tree for this platform... Hi, You mean in my case, appropriate subsystem tree is ARM tree. But I think, as Ben commented, it's better drivers go to upstream via the driver's tree. And of course, I read your comments about this like below... 'platform drivers do not build and/or work without additional platform glue...' Hmm. I'm not sure which way is better... Russell, How do you think? May I send this to your patch tracking system? Or...how should I handle this? Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |