Hello, On Tuesday, January 26, 2010 9:32 AM Ben Dooks wrote: > Does anyone have any opinion on whether plat-s5pc1xx should stay? At the > moment it is only servicing mach-s5pc100 and thenew support for v210 and > s5pc110 seem to be using plat-s5p and not plat-s5pc1xx. I vote for moving s5pc100 support to plat-s5p directory and removing plat-s5pc1xx dir completely. I want to prepare patches for this, but waited until S5PV210 support gets merged. > From the looks of it, s5pc100-init.c could probably be pushed into > the arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/cpu.c file. The s5pc100-clock.c should be > moved into arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/ as well. Right. > Not sure yet what to do with the rest. Most of c100-specific code should be moved to mach-s5pc100 directory. The rest can be probably shared with all S5P platforms. Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski Samsung Poland R&D Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |