Hi, On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, everyone > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:20PM +0900, Ben Dooks wrote: > >> We inted to re-organise the plat-s3c/plat-s3c24xx/plat-s3c64xx into a >> more generic plat-samsung with less code in the other plat- directories >> to make it easier to port new devices and try and clear up some of the >> naming issues with newer devices. Why do you miss the plat-s5pc1xx? Also add the plat-s5pc1xx series. >> >> Start by creating a small arch/arm/plat-samsung with no actuall code in >> so we can move items in as we process them. > (snip) > > Ok, good. > > We will be creating plat-s5p following to plat-samsung and will be submitted > soon. Why new plat-s5p is required? The main goal of plat-* directory is support the SoC common codes. Of course s5pc100 and s5pc110 is different features and different IPs but no need to create each plat directory. Thank you, Kyungmin Park -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |