Hello Will, On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 1:25 PM Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:43:22AM +0000, Alessandro Carminati wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/bug.h > > index 28be048db3f6..044c5e24a17d 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/bug.h > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/bug.h > > @@ -11,8 +11,14 @@ > > > > #include <asm/asm-bug.h> > > > > +#ifdef HAVE_BUG_FUNCTION > > +# define __BUG_FUNC __func__ > > +#else > > +# define __BUG_FUNC NULL > > +#endif > > + > > #define __BUG_FLAGS(flags) \ > > - asm volatile (__stringify(ASM_BUG_FLAGS(flags))); > > + asm volatile (__stringify(ASM_BUG_FLAGS(flags, %c0)) : : "i" (__BUG_FUNC)); > > Why is 'i' the right asm constraint to use here? It seems a bit odd to > use that for a pointer. I received this code as legacy from a previous version. In my review, I considered the case when HAVE_BUG_FUNCTION is defined: Here, __BUG_FUNC is defined as __func__, which is the name of the current function as a string literal. Using the constraint "i" seems appropriate to me in this case. However, when HAVE_BUG_FUNCTION is not defined: __BUG_FUNC is defined as NULL. Initially, I considered it literal 0, but after investigating your concern, I found: ``` $ echo -E "#include <stdio.h>\n#include <stddef.h>\nint main() {\nreturn 0;\n}" | aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -E -dM - | grep NULL #define NULL ((void *)0) ``` I realized that NULL is actually a pointer that is not a link time symbol, and using the "i" constraint with NULL may result in undefined behavior. Would the following alternative definition for __BUG_FUNC be more convincing? ``` #ifdef HAVE_BUG_FUNCTION #define __BUG_FUNC __func__ #else #define __BUG_FUNC (uintptr_t)0 #endif ``` Let me know your thoughts. > > Will > -- --- 172