On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 12:02:47PM +0100, Vasily Gorbik wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 02:41:59PM +0100, Joel Granados wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 04:26:20PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 12:29:46PM +0100, joel granados wrote:
> > > > Move s390 sysctls (spin_retry and userprocess_debug) into their own
> > > > files under arch/s390. We create two new sysctl tables
> > > > (2390_{fault,spin}_sysctl_table) which will be initialized with
> > > > arch_initcall placing them after their original place in proc_root_init.
> > > >
> > > > This is part of a greater effort to move ctl tables into their
> > > > respective subsystems which will reduce the merge conflicts in
> > > > kernel/sysctl.c.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: joel granados <joel.granados@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > arch/s390/mm/fault.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > > > kernel/sysctl.c | 18 ------------------
> > > > 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > How should this go upstream? Will you take care of this, or should
> > > this go via the s390 tree?
> >
> > thx for the review
> >
> > It would be great if you can push it through the s390 tree. However, if
> > it is not possible to do so, please let me know and I'll add it to the
> > sysctl-next changes.
>
> I've slightly changed the commit message
> s390: Move s390 sysctls into their own file under arch/s390
>
> And applied, thank you!
ok. I'll remove it from my future versions.
Thx
--
Joel Granados
