Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] scripts/sorttable: Zero out weak functions in mcount_loc table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 20:06:28 +0000
Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 02:59:22PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > When a function is annotated as "weak" and is overridden, the code is not
> > removed. If it is traced, the fentry/mcount location in the weak function
> > will be referenced by the "__mcount_loc" section. This will then be added
> > to the available_filter_functions list. Since only the address of the
> > functions are listed, to find the name to show, a search of kallsyms is
> > used.  
> 
> This breaks builds with ftrace on architectures without KASLR, one
> affected configuration is bcm2835_defconfig:
> 
> /home/broonie/git/bisect/kernel/trace/ftrace.c: In function 'ftrace_process_locs':
> /home/broonie/git/bisect/kernel/trace/ftrace.c:7057:24: error: implicit declaration of function 'kaslr_offset' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>  7057 |         kaslr = !mod ? kaslr_offset() : 0;
>       |                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> since that happens to enable CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER but doesn't have
> KASLR, we don't have stubs for KASLR on architectures that don't have
> it.  It also looks like from a quick glance at least RISC-V will fail to
> link since it only provides kaslr_offset() with RANDOMIZE_BASE enabled.
> This all feels a bit footgunish.

Already reported:

  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250224180805.GA1536711@ax162/

-- Steve




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux