Re: [RFC net-next 4/7] net/ism: Add kernel-doc comments for ism functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 20:55:24 +0100
Alexandra Winter <wintera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Note that in this RFC this patch is not complete, future versions
> of this patch need to contain comments for all ism_ops.
> Especially signal_event() and handle_event() need a good generic
> description.

Such notes don't belong to the commit message, but to the inline cover
letter IMHO.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandra Winter <wintera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux