On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 10:41:21AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 15.10.24 10:30, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 09:26:03PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 14.10.24 20:20, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > > Looks like this could work. But the comment in smp.c above
> > > > dump_available() needs to be updated.
> > >
> > > A right, I remember that there was some outdated documentation.
...
> My concern is that we'll now have
>
> bool is_kdump_kernel(void)
> {
> return oldmem_data.start && !is_ipl_type_dump();
> }
>
> Which matches 3), but if 2) is also called "kdump", then should it actually
> be
>
> bool is_kdump_kernel(void)
> {
> return oldmem_data.start;
> }
>
> ?
>
> When I wrote that code I was rather convinced that the variant in this patch
> is the right thing to do.
Oh well, we simply of too many dump options. I'll let Alexander and
Mikhail better comment on this :)
Alexander, Mikhail, the discussion starts here, and we need a sane
is_kdump_kernel() for s390:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241014144622.876731-1-david@xxxxxxxxxx/
