On Mon, 2024-10-14 at 08:43 +0200, Gerd Bayer wrote:
> Hi Li RongQing,
>
> On Mon, 2024-10-14 at 13:41 +0800, D. Wythe wrote:
> > On 10/11/24 2:19 PM, Li RongQing wrote:
> > > pnetid of pi (not newly allocated pe) should be compared
> > >
> > > Fixes: e888a2e8337c ("net/smc: introduce list of pnetids for
> > > Ethernet devices")
> > > Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > net/smc/smc_pnet.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/net/smc/smc_pnet.c b/net/smc/smc_pnet.c
> > > index 1dd3623..a04aa0e 100644
> > > --- a/net/smc/smc_pnet.c
> > > +++ b/net/smc/smc_pnet.c
> > > @@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ static int smc_pnet_add_pnetid(struct net
> > > *net,
> > > u8 *pnetid)
> > >
> > > write_lock(&sn->pnetids_ndev.lock);
> > > list_for_each_entry(pi, &sn->pnetids_ndev.list, list) {
> > > - if (smc_pnet_match(pnetid, pe->pnetid)) {
> > > + if (smc_pnet_match(pnetid, pi->pnetid)) {
> > > refcount_inc(&pi->refcnt);
> > > kfree(pe);
> > > goto unlock;
> >
> > Reviewed-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > D. Wythe
> >
>
> Good catch, indeed!
>
> Is this intentionally discussed off-list?
Oops - didn't read the entire To: list...
> For consideration by netdev maintainers this will have to be re-
> submitted with a [PATCH net] prefix to the netdev mailing list.
>
> Also, I'd prefer, if you could find a more descriptive subject. How
> about: "Fix search in list of known pnetids"? However, if you want to
> keep the subject please replace "comparation" with "comparison"
>
> Thank you,
> Gerd Bayer
>
