On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 07:05:29PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Most architectures use pt_regs within ftrace_regs making a lot of the > accessor functions just calls to the pt_regs internally. Instead of > duplication this effort, use a HAVE_ARCH_FTRACE_REGS for architectures > that have their own ftrace_regs that is not based on pt_regs and will > define all the accessor functions, and for the architectures that just use > pt_regs, it will leave it undefined, and the default accessor functions > will be used. > > Note, this will also make it easier to add new accessor functions to > ftrace_regs as it will mean having to touch less architectures. > > Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> ... > arch/s390/include/asm/ftrace.h | 26 +-------------------- Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> # s390
