Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Make ftrace_regs abstract from direct use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:41:40 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Steve, 
> 
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/ftrace.h b/include/asm-generic/ftrace.h
> > index 3a23028d69d2..ba7b7d6e55d6 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/ftrace.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/ftrace.h
> > @@ -10,4 +10,17 @@
> >   * common definitions are already in linux/ftrace.h.
> >   */
> >  
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
> > +struct __arch_ftrace_regs {
> > +	struct pt_regs		regs;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define arch_ftrace_get_regs(fregs)					\
> > +	({ struct __arch_fregs_regs *__f = (struct __arch_ftrace_regs *)(fregs); \
> > +		&__f->regs;						\
> > +	})
> > +
> > +struct ftrace_regs;
> > +#define arch_ftrace_regs(fregs) ((struct __arch_ftrace_regs *)(fregs))
> > +
> >  #endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_FTRACE_H__ */  
> 
> There seems no #endif for CONFIG_HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS.
> I wonder how it passed the build. (#ifdef block does not affect over
> the file boundary?
> 

Yeah I caught that. That's one way I found out that this file is not
compiled by most architectures. I'll be sending a v2 very shortly.

-- Steve





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux