On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 08:02:17AM -0400, Jason J. Herne wrote: > On 9/6/24 6:45 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 08:43:51AM -0400, Jason J. Herne wrote: > > > Advertise features of the driver for the benefit of automated tooling > > > like Libvirt and mdevctl. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Reviewed-by: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Documentation/arch/s390/vfio-ap.rst | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c | 13 +++++++++++ > > > 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+) > > > > Via which tree should this go upstream? > > > I'm not 100% sure. Would s390 next be appropriate? Well that's up to you to decide; no objection from my side. FWIW it would be helpful if for future patches there would be a statement in the cover-letter how this should go upstream. Also looking at the "To" list of your patch I don't think anybody would feel like there is a todo :) That said, you still need to send a v2 which replaces sprintf() with sysfs_emit().
