Re: clearly mark DMA_OPS support as an architecture feasture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 2:30 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 02:27:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > Actually I meant, we can extend the virtio_config_ops to allow mapping
> > ops there, then simulator and VDUSE can hook the map ops there.
>
> From a quick glance that feels like the right layer of abstraction,
> although the config part of the name feels wrong at that point.

Right, or we could have a dedicated map_ops instead of trying to use
virtio_config_ops.

Thanks

>






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux