On 8/15/24 06:39, Jeongjun Park wrote:
Since inet_sk(sk)->pinet6 and smc_sk(sk)->clcsock practically
point to the same address, when smc_create_clcsk() stores the newly
created clcsock in smc_sk(sk)->clcsock, inet_sk(sk)->pinet6 is corrupted
into clcsock. This causes NULL pointer dereference and various other
memory corruptions.
To solve this, we need to modify the smc_sock structure.
Fixes: ac7138746e14 ("smc: establish new socket family")
Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@xxxxxxxxx>
---
net/smc/smc.h | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc.h b/net/smc/smc.h
index 34b781e463c4..0d67a02a6ab1 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc.h
@@ -283,7 +283,10 @@ struct smc_connection {
};
struct smc_sock { /* smc sock container */
- struct sock sk;
+ union {
+ struct sock sk;
+ struct inet_sock inet;
+ };
struct socket *clcsock; /* internal tcp socket */
void (*clcsk_state_change)(struct sock *sk);
/* original stat_change fct. */
As per the running discussion here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/5ad4de6f-48d4-4d1b-b062-e1cd2e8b3600@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/#t
you should include at least a add a comment to the union, describing
which one is used in which case.
My personal preference would be directly replacing 'struct sk' with
'struct inet_sock inet;' and adjust all the smc->sk access accordingly,
likely via a new helper.
I understand that would be much more invasive, but would align with
other AF.
Thanks,
Paolo