Re: [PATCH net,v4] net/smc: prevent NULL pointer dereference in txopt_get

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/14/24 6:49 PM, Jeongjun Park wrote:
Since smc_inet6_prot does not initialize ipv6_pinfo_offset, inet6_create()
copies an incorrect address value, sk + 0 (offset), to inet_sk(sk)->pinet6.

In addition, since inet_sk(sk)->pinet6 and smc_sk(sk)->clcsock practically
point to the same address, when smc_create_clcsk() stores the newly
created clcsock in smc_sk(sk)->clcsock, inet_sk(sk)->pinet6 is corrupted
into clcsock. This causes NULL pointer dereference and various other
memory corruptions.

To solve this, we need to add smc6_sock structure, initialize
.ipv6_pinfo_offset, and modify smc_sock structure.

[  278.629552][T28696] ==================================================================
[  278.631367][T28696] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in txopt_get+0x102/0x430
[  278.632724][T28696] Read of size 4 at addr 0000000000000200 by task syz.0.2965/28696
[  278.634802][T28696]
[  278.635236][T28696] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 28696 Comm: syz.0.2965 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc2 #3
[  278.637458][T28696] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014
[  278.639426][T28696] Call Trace:
[  278.639833][T28696]  <TASK>
[  278.640190][T28696]  dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1b0
[  278.640844][T28696]  ? txopt_get+0x102/0x430
[  278.641620][T28696]  kasan_report+0xbd/0xf0
[  278.642440][T28696]  ? txopt_get+0x102/0x430
[  278.643291][T28696]  kasan_check_range+0xf4/0x1a0
[  278.644163][T28696]  txopt_get+0x102/0x430
[  278.644940][T28696]  ? __pfx_txopt_get+0x10/0x10
[  278.645877][T28696]  ? selinux_netlbl_socket_setsockopt+0x1d0/0x420
[  278.646972][T28696]  calipso_sock_getattr+0xc6/0x3e0
[  278.647630][T28696]  calipso_sock_getattr+0x4b/0x80
[  278.648349][T28696]  netlbl_sock_getattr+0x63/0xc0
[  278.649318][T28696]  selinux_netlbl_socket_setsockopt+0x1db/0x420
[  278.650471][T28696]  ? __pfx_selinux_netlbl_socket_setsockopt+0x10/0x10
[  278.652217][T28696]  ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x120
[  278.652231][T28696]  selinux_socket_setsockopt+0x66/0x90
[  278.652247][T28696]  security_socket_setsockopt+0x57/0xb0
[  278.652278][T28696]  do_sock_setsockopt+0xf2/0x480
[  278.652289][T28696]  ? __pfx_do_sock_setsockopt+0x10/0x10
[  278.652298][T28696]  ? __fget_files+0x24b/0x4a0
[  278.652308][T28696]  ? __fget_light+0x177/0x210
[  278.652316][T28696]  __sys_setsockopt+0x1a6/0x270
[  278.652328][T28696]  ? __pfx___sys_setsockopt+0x10/0x10
[  278.661787][T28696]  ? xfd_validate_state+0x5d/0x180
[  278.662821][T28696]  __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xbd/0x160
[  278.663719][T28696]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7c/0x110
[  278.664690][T28696]  do_syscall_64+0xcb/0x250
[  278.665507][T28696]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
[  278.666618][T28696] RIP: 0033:0x7fe87ed9712d
[  278.667236][T28696] Code: 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7
48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8
ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[  278.670801][T28696] RSP: 002b:00007fe87faa4fa8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036
[  278.671832][T28696] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fe87ef35f80 RCX: 00007fe87ed9712d
[  278.672806][T28696] RDX: 0000000000000036 RSI: 0000000000000029 RDI: 0000000000000003
[  278.674263][T28696] RBP: 00007fe87ee1bd8a R08: 0000000000000018 R09: 0000000000000000
[  278.675967][T28696] R10: 0000000020000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
[  278.677953][T28696] R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fe87ef35f80 R15: 00007fe87fa85000
[  278.679321][T28696]  </TASK>
[  278.679917][T28696] ==================================================================

Fixes: d25a92ccae6b ("net/smc: Introduce IPPROTO_SMC")
Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  net/smc/smc.h      | 5 ++++-
  net/smc/smc_inet.c | 8 +++++++-
  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/smc.h b/net/smc/smc.h
index 34b781e463c4..0d67a02a6ab1 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc.h
@@ -283,7 +283,10 @@ struct smc_connection {
  };
struct smc_sock { /* smc sock container */
-	struct sock		sk;
+	union {
+		struct sock		sk;
+		struct inet_sock	inet;
+	};
  	struct socket		*clcsock;	/* internal tcp socket */
  	void			(*clcsk_state_change)(struct sock *sk);
  						/* original stat_change fct. */
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_inet.c b/net/smc/smc_inet.c
index bece346dd8e9..9e5eff8f5226 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_inet.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_inet.c
@@ -60,6 +60,11 @@ static struct inet_protosw smc_inet_protosw = {
  };
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+struct smc6_sock {
+	struct smc_sock smc;
+	struct ipv6_pinfo inet6;
+};
+
  static struct proto smc_inet6_prot = {
  	.name		= "INET6_SMC",
  	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
@@ -67,9 +72,10 @@ static struct proto smc_inet6_prot = {
  	.hash		= smc_hash_sk,
  	.unhash		= smc_unhash_sk,
  	.release_cb	= smc_release_cb,
-	.obj_size	= sizeof(struct smc_sock),
+	.obj_size	= sizeof(struct smc6_sock),
  	.h.smc_hash	= &smc_v6_hashinfo,
  	.slab_flags	= SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU,
+	.ipv6_pinfo_offset	= offsetof(struct smc6_sock, inet6),
  };
static const struct proto_ops smc_inet6_stream_ops = {
--

Hi Jeongjun,


Thanks for you efforts, it makes sense to me now. But I still need some time to test it
entirely before adding a r-by.

I will appreciate for your patience.


Thanks,
D. Wythe







[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux