On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 8:39 AM Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On 9 Aug 2024, at 12:14 AM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:14:12PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote: > >> > >> > >>> On 7 Aug 2024, at 11:42 PM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello folks, > >>> > >>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 03:50:03PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote: > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> This is the usual sync up in header files we keep in tools directory. > >>>> I put a file to give the reason of this work and not to repeat it in > >>>> every commit message. The changes will be carried in the perf-tools > >>>> tree. > >>> > >>> Could you please double check what's in the tmp.perf-tools branch at the > >>> perf-tools tree so I don't break build and perf trace for arm64, powerpc > >>> and s390? It has this patchset + arm64 unistd header revert (according > >>> to the discussion on patch 6/10) on top of v6.11-rc2. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Namhyung > >> Hi Namhyung, > >> > >> Can you please point to the tree. I checked in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git as well as https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git , but didn’t find the changes. May be I am missing something. I am trying to check the build in powerpc. > > > > Oh, sorry about that. It's in: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools.git > > > > (no -next at the end) > > Hi, > > I did compile test on powerpc and results are good. > > Tested-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for doing this! Namhyung
