Re: [PATCH v1 00/11] mm: replace follow_page() by folio_walk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/11] mm: replace follow_page() by folio_walk
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 22:34:19 -0700
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20240802155524.517137-1-david@redhat.com>
References: <20240802155524.517137-1-david@redhat.com>

On Fri,  2 Aug 2024 17:55:13 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I am not able to test the s390x Secure Execution changes, unfortunately.

I'll add it to -next.  Could the s390 developers please check this?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH v1 00/11] mm: replace follow_page() by folio_walk
  - From: David Hildenbrand

Prev by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] s390 updates for 6.11-rc2
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 07/26] mm: drop CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_NODEDATA_EXTENSION
Previous by thread: [PATCH v1 11/11] mm/ksm: convert break_ksm() from walk_page_range_vma() to folio_walk
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 00/11] mm: replace follow_page() by folio_walk
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Info] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Linux Media] [Device Mapper]