Re: [PATCH v3 22/26] mm: numa_memblks: use memblock_{start,end}_of_DRAM() when sanitizing meminfo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu,  1 Aug 2024 09:08:22 +0300
Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> numa_cleanup_meminfo() moves blocks outside system RAM to
> numa_reserved_meminfo and it uses 0 and PFN_PHYS(max_pfn) to determine
> the memory boundaries.
> 
> Replace the memory range boundaries with more portable
> memblock_start_of_DRAM() and memblock_end_of_DRAM().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx> # for x86_64 and arm64
Makes sense
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  mm/numa_memblks.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/numa_memblks.c b/mm/numa_memblks.c
> index e97665a5e8ce..e4358ad92233 100644
> --- a/mm/numa_memblks.c
> +++ b/mm/numa_memblks.c
> @@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
>   */
>  int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
>  {
> -	const u64 low = 0;
> -	const u64 high = PFN_PHYS(max_pfn);
> +	const u64 low = memblock_start_of_DRAM();
> +	const u64 high = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
>  	int i, j, k;
>  
>  	/* first, trim all entries */





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux