Re: [PATCH 03/15] mips: fix compat_sys_lseek syscall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 06:23:04PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> This is almost compatible, but passing a negative offset should result
> in a EINVAL error, but on mips o32 compat mode would seek to a large
> 32-bit byte offset.
> 
> Use compat_sys_lseek() to correctly sign-extend the argument.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl b/arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl
> index 85751c9b9cdb..2439a2491cff 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
>  17	o32	break				sys_ni_syscall
>  # 18 was sys_stat
>  18	o32	unused18			sys_ni_syscall
> -19	o32	lseek				sys_lseek
> +19	o32	lseek				sys_lseek			compat_sys_lseek
>  20	o32	getpid				sys_getpid
>  21	o32	mount				sys_mount
>  22	o32	umount				sys_oldumount
> -- 
> 2.39.2

applied to mips-fixes.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux