On Thu, 2024-06-20 at 19:25 +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:17:00 +0200
> Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > The STFLE instruction indicates installed facilities.
> > SIE can interpretively execute STFLE.
> > Use a snippet guest executing STFLE to get the result of
> > interpretive execution and check the result.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> [...]
>
>
> > +struct guest_stfle_res {
> > + uint16_t len;
> > + uint64_t reg;
>
> you don't really use reg, do you?
No, and I don't think I will either, must be some vestige.
[...]
>
> > +int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > +{
> > + struct args args = parse_args(argc, argv);
> > +
> > + if (!sclp_facilities.has_sief2) {
> > + report_skip("SIEF2 facility unavailable");
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + report_info("PRNG seed: 0x%lx", args.seed);
> > + prng_s = prng_init(args.seed);
> > + setup_guest();
> > + if (test_facility(7))
> > + test_stfle_format_0();
>
> since STFLE is literally the feature you are testing, maybe you can
> just skip, like you did for SIEF2?
Yeah, that's better.
>
> > +out:
> > + return report_summary();
> > +}
> > diff --git a/s390x/unittests.cfg b/s390x/unittests.cfg
> > index 3a9decc9..f2203069 100644
> > --- a/s390x/unittests.cfg
> > +++ b/s390x/unittests.cfg
> > @@ -392,3 +392,6 @@ file = sie-dat.elf
> >
> > [pv-attest]
> > file = pv-attest.elf
> > +
> > +[stfle-sie]
> > +file = stfle-sie.elf
>
