Re: [PATCH v4 32/35] s390/uaccess: Add KMSAN support to put_user() and get_user()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 11:40 AM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2024-06-18 at 11:24 +0200, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 5:39 PM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > put_user() uses inline assembly with precise constraints, so Clang
> > > is
> > > in principle capable of instrumenting it automatically.
> > > Unfortunately,
> > > one of the constraints contains a dereferenced user pointer, and
> > > Clang
> > > does not currently distinguish user and kernel pointers. Therefore
> > > KMSAN attempts to access shadow for user pointers, which is not a
> > > right
> > > thing to do.
> > >
> > > An obvious fix to add __no_sanitize_memory to __put_user_fn() does
> > > not
> > > work, since it's __always_inline. And __always_inline cannot be
> > > removed
> > > due to the __put_user_bad() trick.
> > >
> > > A different obvious fix of using the "a" instead of the "+Q"
> > > constraint
> > > degrades the code quality, which is very important here, since it's
> > > a
> > > hot path.
> > >
> > > Instead, repurpose the __put_user_asm() macro to define
> > > __put_user_{char,short,int,long}_noinstr() functions and mark them
> > > with
> > > __no_sanitize_memory. For the non-KMSAN builds make them
> > > __always_inline in order to keep the generated code quality. Also
> > > define __put_user_{char,short,int,long}() functions, which call the
> > > aforementioned ones and which *are* instrumented, because they call
> > > KMSAN hooks, which may be implemented as macros.
> >
> > I am not really familiar with s390 assembly, but I think you still
> > need to call kmsan_copy_to_user() and kmsan_copy_from_user() to
> > properly initialize the copied data and report infoleaks.
> > Would it be possible to insert calls to linux/instrumented.h hooks
> > into uaccess functions?
>
> Aren't the existing instrument_get_user() / instrument_put_user() calls
> sufficient?

Oh, sorry, I overlooked them. Yes, those should be sufficient.
But you don't include linux/instrumented.h, do you?





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux