Re: [PATCH v2] mm/mm_init: use node's number of cpus in deferred_page_init_max_threads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Chanudet <echanude@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> x86_64 is already using the node's cpu as maximum threads. Make that the
> default for all archs setting DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT.
>
> This returns to the behavior prior making the function arch-specific
> with commit ecd096506922 ("mm: make deferred init's max threads
> arch-specific").
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Chanudet <echanude@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> Setting DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT and testing on a few arm64 platforms
> shows faster deferred_init_memmap completions:
>
> |         | x13s        | SA8775p-ride | Ampere R137-P31 | Ampere HR330 |
> |         | Metal, 32GB | VM, 36GB     | VM, 58GB        | Metal, 128GB |
> |         | 8cpus       | 8cpus        | 8cpus           | 32cpus       |
> |---------|-------------|--------------|-----------------|--------------|
> | threads |  ms     (%) | ms       (%) |  ms         (%) |  ms      (%) |
> |---------|-------------|--------------|-----------------|--------------|
> | 1       | 108    (0%) | 72      (0%) | 224        (0%) | 324     (0%) |
> | cpus    |  24  (-77%) | 36    (-50%) |  40      (-82%) |  56   (-82%) |
>
> - v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20240520231555.395979-5-echanude@xxxxxxxxxx
> - Changes since v1:
>  - Make the generic function return the number of cpus of the node as
>    max threads limit instead overriding it for arm64.
> - Drop Baoquan He's R-b on v1 since the logic changed.
> - Add CCs according to patch changes (ppc and s390 set
>   DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT by default).
>
>  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 12 ------------
>  mm/mm_init.c          |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)

On a machine here (1TB, 40 cores, 4KB pages) the existing code gives:

  [    0.500124] node 2 deferred pages initialised in 210ms
  [    0.515790] node 3 deferred pages initialised in 230ms
  [    0.516061] node 0 deferred pages initialised in 230ms
  [    0.516522] node 7 deferred pages initialised in 230ms
  [    0.516672] node 4 deferred pages initialised in 230ms
  [    0.516798] node 6 deferred pages initialised in 230ms
  [    0.517051] node 5 deferred pages initialised in 230ms
  [    0.523887] node 1 deferred pages initialised in 240ms

vs with the patch:

  [    0.379613] node 0 deferred pages initialised in 90ms
  [    0.380388] node 1 deferred pages initialised in 90ms
  [    0.380540] node 4 deferred pages initialised in 100ms
  [    0.390239] node 6 deferred pages initialised in 100ms
  [    0.390249] node 2 deferred pages initialised in 100ms
  [    0.390786] node 3 deferred pages initialised in 110ms
  [    0.396721] node 5 deferred pages initialised in 110ms
  [    0.397095] node 7 deferred pages initialised in 110ms

Which is a nice speedup.

Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (powerpc)

cheers




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux