[PATCH v3 05/10] s390/uv: update PG_arch_1 comment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We removed the usage of PG_arch_1 for page tables in commit
a51324c430db ("s390/cmma: rework no-dat handling").

Let's update the comment in UV to reflect that.

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/s390/kernel/uv.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c b/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
index 914dcec27329..ecfc08902215 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
@@ -495,13 +495,12 @@ int arch_make_page_accessible(struct page *page)
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
-	 * PG_arch_1 is used in 3 places:
-	 * 1. for kernel page tables during early boot
-	 * 2. for storage keys of huge pages and KVM
-	 * 3. As an indication that this small folio might be secure. This can
+	 * PG_arch_1 is used in 2 places:
+	 * 1. for storage keys of hugetlb folios and KVM
+	 * 2. As an indication that this small folio might be secure. This can
 	 *    overindicate, e.g. we set the bit before calling
 	 *    convert_to_secure.
-	 * As secure pages are never huge, all 3 variants can co-exists.
+	 * As secure pages are never large folios, both variants can co-exists.
 	 */
 	if (!test_bit(PG_arch_1, &folio->flags))
 		return 0;
-- 
2.45.0





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux