On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 07:25:27PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> It has been removed in commit 2c6b96762fbd ("s390/fpu: remove TIF_FPU"),
> so we should not mention TIF_FPU in the comment here anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/s390/kernel/process.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/process.c b/arch/s390/kernel/process.c
> index dd456b475861..3e7df2e579f1 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/process.c
> @@ -88,8 +88,7 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src)
> {
> /*
> * Save the floating-point or vector register state of the current
> - * task and set the TIF_FPU flag to lazy restore the FPU register
> - * state when returning to user space.
> + * task.
> */
> save_user_fpu_regs();
Could you change your patch to remove the whole comment instead, please?
Without the TIF_FPU part the comment becomes quite pointless, since it
only documents the obvious.
