Re: [PATCH vfs.all 15/26] s390/dasd: use bdev api in dasd_format()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 02:35:55AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> >  drivers/s390/block/dasd_ioctl.c | 5 +++--
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_ioctl.c b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_ioctl.c
> > index 7e0ed7032f76..c1201590f343 100644
> > --- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_ioctl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_ioctl.c
> > @@ -215,8 +215,9 @@ dasd_format(struct dasd_block *block, struct format_data_t *fdata)
> >  	 * enabling the device later.
> >  	 */
> >  	if (fdata->start_unit == 0) {
> > -		block->gdp->part0->bd_inode->i_blkbits =
> > -			blksize_bits(fdata->blksize);
> > +		rc = set_blocksize(block->gdp->part0, fdata->blksize);
> 
> Could somebody (preferably s390 folks) explain what is going on in
> dasd_format()?  The change in this commit is *NOT* an equivalent
> transformation - mainline does not evict the page cache of device.
> 
> Is that
> 	* intentional behaviour in mainline version, possibly broken
> by this patch
> 	* a bug in mainline accidentally fixed by this patch
> 	* something else?
> 
> And shouldn't there be an exclusion between that and having a filesystem
> on a partition of that disk currently mounted?

CC-ing Stefan and Jan.

Thanks!




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux