On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 03:49:53PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote: > On 2024/4/4 4:45, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 16:37:58 +0800 Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > After VMA lock-based page fault handling enabled, if bad access met > > > under per-vma lock, it will fallback to mmap_lock-based handling, > > > so it leads to unnessary mmap lock and vma find again. A test from > > > lmbench shows 34% improve after this changes on arm64, > > > > > > lat_sig -P 1 prot lat_sig 0.29194 -> 0.19198 > > > > > > Only build test on other archs except arm64. > > > > Thanks. So we now want a bunch of architectures to runtime test this. Do > > we have a selftest in place which will adequately do this? > > I don't find such selftest, and badaccess would lead to coredump, the > performance should not affect most scene, so no selftest is acceptable. > lmbench is easy to use to measure the performance. The rationale for this series (performance improvement) is a bit odd, since I would expect that the changed code is usually never executed.
