On Sat Apr 6, 2024 at 12:24 AM AEST, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 07:00:39PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > SC2235 (style): Use { ..; } instead of (..) to avoid subshell
> > overhead.
> >
> > No bug identified. Overhead is pretty irrelevant.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > scripts/arch-run.bash | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/arch-run.bash b/scripts/arch-run.bash
> > index ae4b06679..d1edd1d69 100644
> > --- a/scripts/arch-run.bash
> > +++ b/scripts/arch-run.bash
> > @@ -580,15 +580,15 @@ kvm_available ()
> > return 1
> >
> > [ "$HOST" = "$ARCH_NAME" ] ||
> > - ( [ "$HOST" = aarch64 ] && [ "$ARCH" = arm ] ) ||
> > - ( [ "$HOST" = x86_64 ] && [ "$ARCH" = i386 ] )
> > + { [ "$HOST" = aarch64 ] && [ "$ARCH" = arm ] ; } ||
> > + { [ "$HOST" = x86_64 ] && [ "$ARCH" = i386 ] ; }
> > }
> >
> > hvf_available ()
> > {
> > [ "$(sysctl -n kern.hv_support 2>/dev/null)" = "1" ] || return 1
> > [ "$HOST" = "$ARCH_NAME" ] ||
> > - ( [ "$HOST" = x86_64 ] && [ "$ARCH" = i386 ] )
> > + { [ "$HOST" = x86_64 ] && [ "$ARCH" = i386 ] ; }
> > }
>
> This one is a bit ugly. Most developers are used to seeing expressions
> like
>
> a || (b && c)
>
> not
>
> a || { b && c ; }
>
> I'm inclined to add SC2235 to the ignore list...
I'm sure it's a good warning for bash scripts that do a lot of
computation and have these in hot loops. But I _think_ none of
our scripts are like that so I would be okay with disabling
the warning. I'll do that unless someone disagrees.
Thanks,
Nick
