On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 06:36:40PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Now that make_folio_secure() may only set PG_arch_1 for small folios, > let's convert relevant remaining UV code to only work on (small) folios > and simply reject large folios early. This way, we'll never end up > touching PG_arch_1 on tail pages of a large folio in UV code. > > The folio_get()/folio_put() for functions that are documented to already > hold a folio reference look weird and it should probably be removed. > Similarly, uv_destroy_owned_page() and uv_convert_owned_from_secure() > should really consume a folio reference instead. But these are cleanups for > another day. Yes, and we should convert arch_make_page_accessible() to arch_make_folio_accessible() ... one of the two callers already has the folio (and page-writeback already calls arch_make_folio_accessible()
