On 3/25/24 18:09, Maíra Canal wrote:
On 3/25/24 16:24, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 04:05:06PM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On 3/25/24 14:52, Guenter Roeck wrote:
The drm_test_rect_calc_hscale and drm_test_rect_calc_vscale unit tests
intentionally trigger warning backtraces by providing bad parameters to
the tested functions. What is tested is the return value, not the existence
of a warning backtrace. Suppress the backtraces to avoid clogging the
kernel log.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
- Rebased to v6.9-rc1
- Added Tested-by:, Acked-by:, and Reviewed-by: tags
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c
index 76332cd2ead8..75614cb4deb5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c
@@ -406,22 +406,28 @@ KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(drm_rect_scale, drm_rect_scale_cases, drm_rect_scale_case_desc
static void drm_test_rect_calc_hscale(struct kunit *test)
{
+ DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(drm_calc_scale);
const struct drm_rect_scale_case *params = test->param_value;
int scaling_factor;
+ START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(drm_calc_scale);
I'm not sure if it is not that obvious only to me, but it would be nice
to have a comment here, remembering that we provide bad parameters in
some test cases.
Sure. Something like this ?
/*
* drm_rect_calc_hscale() generates a warning backtrace whenever bad
* parameters are passed to it. This affects all unit tests with an
* error code in expected_scaling_factor.
*/
Yeah, perfect. With that, feel free to add my
Acked-by: Maíra Canal <mcanal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks!
Guenter
