在 2024/3/4 17:34, Mark Rutland 写道:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 10:27:01AM +0800, JiaLong.Yang wrote:
The struct pmu cpumf_pmu has handled generic events. So it need some
flags to tell core this thing.
It's not necessary to register as PERF_TYPE_RAW in order to handle raw events,
and PERF_TYPE_RAW is not a flag.
Have you encountered a functional problem, or was this found by inspection?
As you expected, I'm trying to confirm which one pmu has the capability
to handle generic events in registering pmus instead of test generic
events in each pmus when opening.
We can confirm that before using. We have pay more in handling them when
opening.
So most driver developers use PERF_TYPE_RAW. x86 and arm use
PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE. Others use struct pmu::task_ctx_nr =
perf_hw_context.
I think PERF_TYPE_RAW will be a easily accepted way. So ...
How do you think about this?
Mark.
Signed-off-by: JiaLong.Yang <jialong.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
index 41ed6e0f0a2a..6ba36cf50091 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
@@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@ static int __init cpumf_pmu_init(void)
debug_register_view(cf_dbg, &debug_sprintf_view);
cpumf_pmu.attr_groups = cpumf_cf_event_group();
- rc = perf_pmu_register(&cpumf_pmu, "cpum_cf", -1);
+ rc = perf_pmu_register(&cpumf_pmu, "cpum_cf", PERF_TYPE_RAW);
if (rc) {
pr_err("Registering the cpum_cf PMU failed with rc=%i\n", rc);
goto out2;
--
2.25.1
