[RFC net-next 09/20] net/smc: refator smc_switch_to_fallback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Move code ahead which has no need protected by clcsock_release_lock,
On the one hand, this reduces the granularity of the critical area, and
on the other hand, for the inet version of SMC, the code protected by
the critical area is meaningless. This patch make it possible to invoke
smc_switch_to_fallback() in any context (IRQ .etc) within inet sock
version of SMC.

Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/smc/af_smc.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 1381ac1..20abdda 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -909,16 +909,18 @@ static int smc_switch_to_fallback(struct smc_sock *smc, int reason_code)
 {
 	int rc = 0;
 
+	/* no need protected by clcsock_release_lock, move head */
+	smc->use_fallback = true;
+	smc->fallback_rsn = reason_code;
+	smc_stat_fallback(smc);
+	trace_smc_switch_to_fallback(smc, reason_code);
+
 	mutex_lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
 	if (!smc->clcsock) {
 		rc = -EBADF;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	smc->use_fallback = true;
-	smc->fallback_rsn = reason_code;
-	smc_stat_fallback(smc);
-	trace_smc_switch_to_fallback(smc, reason_code);
 	if (smc->sk.sk_socket && smc->sk.sk_socket->file) {
 		smc->clcsock->file = smc->sk.sk_socket->file;
 		smc->clcsock->file->private_data = smc->clcsock;
-- 
1.8.3.1





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux