Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] mm/memory: optimize fork() with PTE-mapped THP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



dontneed should hopefully/likely see a speedup.

Yes, but that's almost exactly the same path as munmap, so I'm sure it really
adds much for this particular series.

Right, that's why I'm not including these measurements. dontneed vs. munmap is more about measuring the overhead of VMA modifications + page table reclaim.

Anyway, on Altra at least, I'm seeing no
regressions, so:

Tested-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>


Thanks!

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux