On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 09:09:47PM +0000, patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hello: > > This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (fixes) > by Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Tue, 26 Dec 2023 13:46:10 -0800 you wrote: > > A test [1] in Android test suite started failing after [2] was merged. > > It turns out that after handling a major fault under per-VMA lock, the > > process major fault counter does not register that fault as major. > > Before [2] read faults would be done under mmap_lock, in which case > > FAULT_FLAG_TRIED flag is set before retrying. That in turn causes > > mm_account_fault() to account the fault as major once retry completes. > > With per-VMA locks we often retry because a fault can't be handled > > without locking the whole mm using mmap_lock. Therefore such retries > > do not set FAULT_FLAG_TRIED flag. This logic does not work after [2] > > because we can now handle read major faults under per-VMA lock and > > upon retry the fact there was a major fault gets lost. Fix this by > > setting FAULT_FLAG_TRIED after retrying under per-VMA lock if > > VM_FAULT_MAJOR was returned. Ideally we would use an additional > > VM_FAULT bit to indicate the reason for the retry (could not handle > > under per-VMA lock vs other reason) but this simpler solution seems > > to work, so keeping it simple. > > > > [...] > > Here is the summary with links: > - [1/1] arch/mm/fault: fix major fault accounting when retrying under per-VMA lock > https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/46e714c729c8 > > You are awesome, thank you! Now that 32-bit ARM has support for the per-VMA lock, does that also need to be patched? -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
