On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 08:27:49PM +0800, Wen Gu wrote:
>A crash was found when dumping SMC-D connections. It can be reproduced
>by following steps:
>
>- run nginx/wrk test:
> smc_run nginx
> smc_run wrk -t 16 -c 1000 -d <duration> -H 'Connection: Close' <URL>
>
>- continuously dump SMC-D connections in parallel:
> watch -n 1 'smcss -D'
>
> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000030
> CPU: 2 PID: 7204 Comm: smcss Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 6.7.0+ #55
> RIP: 0010:__smc_diag_dump.constprop.0+0x5e5/0x620 [smc_diag]
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> ? __die+0x24/0x70
> ? page_fault_oops+0x66/0x150
> ? exc_page_fault+0x69/0x140
> ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30
> ? __smc_diag_dump.constprop.0+0x5e5/0x620 [smc_diag]
> ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x35d/0x430
> ? __alloc_skb+0x77/0x170
> smc_diag_dump_proto+0xd0/0xf0 [smc_diag]
> smc_diag_dump+0x26/0x60 [smc_diag]
> netlink_dump+0x19f/0x320
> __netlink_dump_start+0x1dc/0x300
> smc_diag_handler_dump+0x6a/0x80 [smc_diag]
> ? __pfx_smc_diag_dump+0x10/0x10 [smc_diag]
> sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x121/0x140
> ? __pfx_sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10
> netlink_rcv_skb+0x5a/0x110
> sock_diag_rcv+0x28/0x40
> netlink_unicast+0x22a/0x330
> netlink_sendmsg+0x1f8/0x420
> __sock_sendmsg+0xb0/0xc0
> ____sys_sendmsg+0x24e/0x300
> ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x62/0x80
> ___sys_sendmsg+0x7c/0xd0
> ? __do_fault+0x34/0x160
> ? do_read_fault+0x5f/0x100
> ? do_fault+0xb0/0x110
> ? __handle_mm_fault+0x2b0/0x6c0
> __sys_sendmsg+0x4d/0x80
> do_syscall_64+0x69/0x180
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
>
>It is possible that the connection is in process of being established
>when we dump it. Assumed that the connection has been registered in a
>link group by smc_conn_create() but the rmb_desc has not yet been
>initialized by smc_buf_create(), thus causing the illegal access to
>conn->rmb_desc. So fix it by checking before dump.
>
>Fixes: ce51f63e63c5 ("net/smc: Prevent kernel-infoleak in __smc_diag_dump()")
ce51f63e63c5 ("net/smc: Prevent kernel-infoleak in __smc_diag_dump()")
only add a memset() of 'struct smcd_diag_dmbinfo dinfo', which I don't
think is not the real cause of the bug.
>Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>---
> net/smc/smc_diag.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/smc/smc_diag.c b/net/smc/smc_diag.c
>index 52f7c4f1e767..5a33908015f3 100644
>--- a/net/smc/smc_diag.c
>+++ b/net/smc/smc_diag.c
>@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static int __smc_diag_dump(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> }
> if (smc_conn_lgr_valid(&smc->conn) && smc->conn.lgr->is_smcd &&
> (req->diag_ext & (1 << (SMC_DIAG_DMBINFO - 1))) &&
>- !list_empty(&smc->conn.lgr->list)) {
>+ !list_empty(&smc->conn.lgr->list) && smc->conn.rmb_desc) {
> struct smc_connection *conn = &smc->conn;
> struct smcd_diag_dmbinfo dinfo;
> struct smcd_dev *smcd = conn->lgr->smcd;
>--
>2.43.0
