Re: [PATCH] selftests/livepatch: fix and refactor new dmesg message code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 20 Dec 2023, Joe Lawrence wrote:

> The livepatching kselftests rely on comparing expected vs. observed
> dmesg output.  After each test, new dmesg entries are determined by the
> 'comm' utility comparing a saved, pre-test copy of dmesg to post-test
> dmesg output.
> 
> Alexander reports that the 'comm --nocheck-order -13' invocation used by
> the tests can be confused when dmesg entry timestamps vary in magnitude
> (ie, "[   98.820331]" vs. "[  100.031067]"), in which case, additional
> messages are reported as new.  The unexpected entries then spoil the
> test results.
> 
> Instead of relying on 'comm' or 'diff' to determine new testing dmesg
> entries, refactor the code:
> 
>   - pre-test  : log a unique canary dmesg entry
>   - test      : run tests, log messages
>   - post-test : filter dmesg starting from pre-test message
> 
> Reported-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/live-patching/ZYAimyPYhxVA9wKg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> Signed-off-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>

M




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux