Re: [PATCH v3 17/34] lib/zlib: Unpoison DFLTCC output buffers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 12:36 AM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The constraints of the DFLTCC inline assembly are not precise: they
> do not communicate the size of the output buffers to the compiler, so
> it cannot automatically instrument it.
>
> Add the manual kmsan_unpoison_memory() calls for the output buffers.
> The logic is the same as in [1].
>
> [1] https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng/commit/1f5ddcc009ac3511e99fc88736a9e1a6381168c5
>
> Reported-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>


> @@ -34,6 +37,7 @@ static inline dfltcc_cc dfltcc(
>  )
>  {
>      Byte *t2 = op1 ? *op1 : NULL;
> +    unsigned char *orig_t2 = t2;
>      size_t t3 = len1 ? *len1 : 0;
>      const Byte *t4 = op2 ? *op2 : NULL;
>      size_t t5 = len2 ? *len2 : 0;
> @@ -59,6 +63,26 @@ static inline dfltcc_cc dfltcc(
>                       : "cc", "memory");
>      t2 = r2; t3 = r3; t4 = r4; t5 = r5;
>
> +    switch (fn & DFLTCC_FN_MASK) {

It might be a good idea to add a comment explaining what this block of
code does.
(And that it is no-op in non-KMSAN builds)





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux