Right now it is possible to see gmap->private being zero in kvm_s390_vsie_gmap_notifier resulting in a crash. This is due to the fact that we add gmap->private == kvm after creation: static int acquire_gmap_shadow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page) { [...] gmap = gmap_shadow(vcpu->arch.gmap, asce, edat); if (IS_ERR(gmap)) return PTR_ERR(gmap); gmap->private = vcpu->kvm; Let children inherit the private field of the parent. Reported-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fixes: a3508fbe9dc6 ("KVM: s390: vsie: initial support for nested virtualization") Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- v1->v2: let the child inherit private from parent instead of accessing the parent in the notifier arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 1 - arch/s390/mm/gmap.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c index 8207a892bbe2..db9a180de65f 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c @@ -1220,7 +1220,6 @@ static int acquire_gmap_shadow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gmap = gmap_shadow(vcpu->arch.gmap, asce, edat); if (IS_ERR(gmap)) return PTR_ERR(gmap); - gmap->private = vcpu->kvm; vcpu->kvm->stat.gmap_shadow_create++; WRITE_ONCE(vsie_page->gmap, gmap); return 0; diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c index 6f96b5a71c63..8da39deb56ca 100644 --- a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c +++ b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c @@ -1691,6 +1691,7 @@ struct gmap *gmap_shadow(struct gmap *parent, unsigned long asce, return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); new->mm = parent->mm; new->parent = gmap_get(parent); + new->private = parent->private; new->orig_asce = asce; new->edat_level = edat_level; new->initialized = false; -- 2.41.0