On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 05:52:17PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > +void bdev_associated_mapping(struct block_device *bdev,
> > + struct address_space *mapping)
> > +{
> > + mapping->host = bdev->bd_inode;
> > +}
>
> Here I'm not sure - is the helper really a win? It seems a bit obscure to
> me. This initialization of another mapping for a bdev looks really special.
If we want to hide bd_inode we'll something like this helper even if
I don't particularly like it either.
But it might be a good idea to move out of this series and into the
follow on removing bd_inode, as it's rather pointless without that
context.
