Re: [Bug report] More xfs courruption issue found on s390x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 05:26:14PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >   XFS: Assertion failed: ip->i_nblocks == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c, line: 2359
>
> IOWs, all four of these issues are the same problem - journal
> recovery is not resulting in a correct and consistent filesystem
> after the journal has been flushed at runtime, so please discuss and
> consolidate them all in the initial bug report thread....

As recently reported, fortunately we now have reproducers for x86_64 too:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218224

This fails on the following test sections as defined by kdevops [1]:

  * xfs_nocrc_2k
  * xfs_reflink
  * xfs_reflink_1024
  * xfs_reflink_2k
  * xfs_reflink_4k
  * xfs_reflink_dir_bsize_8k
  * xfs_reflink_logdev
  * xfs_reflink_normapbt
  * xfs_reflink_nrext64

[0] https://github.com/linux-kdevops/kdevops/blob/master/playbooks/roles/fstests/templates/xfs/xfs.config

Example failures:

  * generic/475: https://gist.github.com/mcgrof/5d6f504f4695ba27cea7df5d63f35197
  * generic/388: https://gist.github.com/mcgrof/c1c8b1dc76fdc1032a5f0aab6c2a14bf
  * generic/648: https://gist.github.com/mcgrof/1e506ecbe898b45428d6e7febfc02db1

  Luis




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux