On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 05:07:45PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2023, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > >> Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > >> > There are a bunch of reported randconfig failures now because of this,
> > >> > something like:
> > >> >
> > >> >>> arch/powerpc/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/vfio.c:89:7: warning: attribute declaration must precede definition [-Wignored-attributes]
> > >> > fn = symbol_get(vfio_file_iommu_group);
> > >> > ^
> > >> > include/linux/module.h:805:60: note: expanded from macro 'symbol_get'
> > >> > #define symbol_get(x) ({ extern typeof(x) x __attribute__((weak,visibility("hidden"))); &(x); })
> > >> >
> > >> > It happens because the arch forces KVM_VFIO without knowing if VFIO is
> > >> > even enabled.
> > >>
> > >> This is still breaking some builds. Can we get this fix in please?
> > >>
> > >> cheers
> > >>
> > >> > Split the kconfig so the arch selects the usual HAVE_KVM_ARCH_VFIO and
> > >> > then KVM_VFIO is only enabled if the arch wants it and VFIO is turned on.
> > >
> > > Heh, so I was trying to figure out why things like vfio_file_set_kvm() aren't
> > > problematic, i.e. why the existing mess didn't cause failures. I can't repro the
> > > warning (requires clang-16?), but IIUC the reason only the group code is problematic
> > > is that vfio.h creates a stub for vfio_file_iommu_group() and thus there's no symbol,
> > > whereas vfio.h declares vfio_file_set_kvm() unconditionally.
> >
> > That warning I'm unsure about.
>
> Ah, it's the same warning, I just missed the CONFIG_MODULES=n requirement.
Oh, wait, doesn't that mean the approach won't work? IIRC doesn't
symbol_get turn into just &fn when non-modular turning this into a
link failure without the kconfig part?
Jason
