Re: [PATCH net-next v4] net/smc: remove unneeded atomic operations in smc_tx_sndbuf_nonempty

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 23.11.23 02:45, Li RongQing wrote:
> The commit dcd2cf5f2fc0 ("net/smc: add autocorking support") adds an
> atomic variable tx_pushing in smc_connection to make sure only one can
> send to let it cork more and save CDC slot. since smc_tx_pending can be
> called in the soft IRQ without checking sock_owned_by_user() at that
> time, which would cause a race condition because bh_lock_sock() did
> not honor sock_lock()
> After commit 6b88af839d20 ("net/smc: don't send in the BH context if
> sock_owned_by_user"), the transmission is deferred to when sock_lock()
> is held by the user. Therefore, we no longer need tx_pending to hold
> message.
> So remove atomic variable tx_pushing and its operation, and
> smc_tx_sndbuf_nonempty becomes a wrapper of __smc_tx_sndbuf_nonempty,
> so rename __smc_tx_sndbuf_nonempty back to smc_tx_sndbuf_nonempty
> Suggested-by: Alexandra Winter <wintera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Dust Li <>
> Signed-off-by: Dust Li <>
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Alexandra Winter <wintera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

However I think this time you did not use scripts/ [1]
to determine the correct recipient list for this email.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux