Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] i915: make inject_virtual_interrupt() void

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023.11.22 13:48:22 +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> The single caller of inject_virtual_interrupt() ignores the return value
> anyway. This allows us to simplify eventfd_signal() in follow-up
> patches.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/interrupt.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/interrupt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/interrupt.c
> index de3f5903d1a7..9665876b4b13 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/interrupt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/interrupt.c
> @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ static void init_irq_map(struct intel_gvt_irq *irq)
>  #define MSI_CAP_DATA(offset) (offset + 8)
>  #define MSI_CAP_EN 0x1
>  
> -static int inject_virtual_interrupt(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
> +static void inject_virtual_interrupt(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
>  {
>  	unsigned long offset = vgpu->gvt->device_info.msi_cap_offset;
>  	u16 control, data;
> @@ -434,10 +434,10 @@ static int inject_virtual_interrupt(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
>  
>  	/* Do not generate MSI if MSIEN is disabled */
>  	if (!(control & MSI_CAP_EN))
> -		return 0;
> +		return;
>  
>  	if (WARN(control & GENMASK(15, 1), "only support one MSI format\n"))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		return;
>  
>  	trace_inject_msi(vgpu->id, addr, data);
>  
> @@ -451,10 +451,10 @@ static int inject_virtual_interrupt(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
>  	 * returned and don't inject interrupt into guest.
>  	 */
>  	if (!test_bit(INTEL_VGPU_STATUS_ATTACHED, vgpu->status))
> -		return -ESRCH;
> -	if (vgpu->msi_trigger && eventfd_signal(vgpu->msi_trigger, 1) != 1)
> -		return -EFAULT;
> -	return 0;
> +		return;
> +	if (!vgpu->msi_trigger)
> +		return;
> +	eventfd_signal(vgpu->msi_trigger, 1);
>  }

I think it's a little simpler to write as
    if (vgpu->msi_trigger)
            eventfd_signal(vgpu->msi_trigger, 1);

Looks fine with me.

Reviewed-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

>  
>  static void propagate_event(struct intel_gvt_irq *irq,
> 
> -- 
> 2.42.0
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux