Ignat Korchagin <ignat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Good day! > > We have recently started to evaluate Linux 6.6 and noticed that we > cannot disable CONFIG_KEXEC anymore, but keep CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP > enabled. It seems to be related to commit 89cde455 ("kexec: > consolidate kexec and crash options into kernel/Kconfig.kexec"), where > a CONFIG_KEXEC dependency was added to CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP. > > In our current kernel (Linux 6.1) we only enable CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE > with enforced signature check to support the kernel crash dumping > functionality and would like to keep CONFIG_KEXEC disabled for > security reasons [1]. > > I was reading the long commit message, but the reason for adding > CONFIG_KEXEC as a dependency for CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP evaded me. And I > believe from the implementation perspective CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE should > suffice here (as we successfully used it for crashdumps on Linux 6.1). > > Is there a reason for adding this dependency or is it just an > oversight? Would some solution of requiring either CONFIG_KEXEC or > CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE work here? I don't actually see any reason for CRASH_DUMP to depend on KEXEC or KEXEC_FILE. None of the old CRASH_DUMP symbols depended on KEXEC AFAICS. Using something like: $ git diff 89cde455..95d1fef5 | grep -A 3 "^-.*config CRASH_DUMP" It's reasonable to want to build a kernel that supports CRASH_DUMP (ie. can be a dump kernel), but doesn't support kexec and requires a regular reboot. Though I doubt anyone does that in practice? cheers