Hey Kees, thanks for the patch. can you please send this patch to linux-scsi and CC the SCSI Maintainers (Martin and James) instead (having linux-s390 on CC is fine)? zFCP doesn't go via s390, being a SCSI driver. On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 11:14:35AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > strlcpy() reads the entire source buffer first. This read may exceed > the destination size limit. This is both inefficient and can lead > to linear read overflows if a source string is not NUL-terminated[1]. > Additionally, it returns the size of the source string, not the > resulting size of the destination string. In an effort to remove strlcpy() > completely[2], replace strlcpy() here with strscpy(). > > Be explicitly robust in the face of truncation, which should be an > impossible state. > > Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strlcpy [1] > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/89 [2] > Cc: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Benjamin Block <bblock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c | 11 +++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c > index 4f0d0e55f0d4..1a29f10767fc 100644 > --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c > +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c > @@ -900,8 +900,15 @@ static void zfcp_fc_rspn(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter, > zfcp_fc_ct_ns_init(&rspn_req->ct_hdr, FC_NS_RSPN_ID, > FC_SYMBOLIC_NAME_SIZE); > hton24(rspn_req->rspn.fr_fid.fp_fid, fc_host_port_id(shost)); > - len = strlcpy(rspn_req->rspn.fr_name, fc_host_symbolic_name(shost), > - FC_SYMBOLIC_NAME_SIZE); > + len = strscpy(rspn_req->name, fc_host_symbolic_name(shost), > + sizeof(rspn_req->name)); This is corrct. > + /* > + * It should be impossible for this to truncate, as > + * sizeof(rspn_req->name) is equal to max size of > + * fc_host_symbolic_name(shost), but check anyway. > + */ > + if (len < 0) > + len = sizeof(rspn_req->name) - 1; I'd rather have a compile-time check, whether the array sizes of `rspn_req->name` and `fc_host_symbolic_name(shost)` run out of sync, or against our expectations. Something like: len = strscpy(rspn_req->name, fc_host_symbolic_name(shost), sizeof(rspn_req->name)); BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(rspn_req->name) != sizeof(fc_host_symbolic_name(shost)) || sizeof(rspn_req->name) != 1 << sizeof(rspn_req->rspn.fr_name_len) * 8); rspn_req->rspn.fr_name_len = len; Then the last assignment should also be correct; and if something changes - unexpectedly, because this follows a FC standard - we need to adapt the code anyway I'd think. Or am I missing something? > rspn_req->rspn.fr_name_len = len; > > sg_init_one(&fc_req->sg_req, rspn_req, sizeof(*rspn_req)); > -- > 2.34.1 > -- Best Regards, Benjamin Block / Linux on IBM Z Kernel Development IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH / https://www.ibm.com/privacy Vors. Aufs.-R.: Gregor Pillen / Geschäftsführung: David Faller Sitz der Ges.: Böblingen / Registergericht: AmtsG Stuttgart, HRB 243294
