On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 13:31:17 +0100 Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Use the previously unused S390_ARCH_FAC_MASK_SIZE_U64 instead of > S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_U64 for defining the fac_mask array. > Note that both values are the same, there is no functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h > index 427f9528a7b6..46fcd2f9dff8 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h > @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ struct s390_io_adapter { > > struct kvm_s390_cpu_model { > /* facility mask supported by kvm & hosting machine */ > - __u64 fac_mask[S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_U64]; > + __u64 fac_mask[S390_ARCH_FAC_MASK_SIZE_U64]; > struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_subfunc subfuncs; > /* facility list requested by guest (in dma page) */ > __u64 *fac_list;