On 11/1/23 12:57, Halil Pasic wrote:
The lock member of struct subchannel used to be a spinlock, but became
a pointer to a spinlock with commit 2ec2298412e1 ("[S390] subchannel
lock conversion."). This might have been justified back then, but with
the current state of affairs, there is no reason to manage a separate
spinlock object.
Let's simplify things and pull the spinlock back into struct subchannel.
Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic<pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
I know it is a lot of churn, but I do believe in the end it does make
the code more maintainable.
You are right. Makes the code easy to read and a bit less complex.
Looks good to me. Thanks
Reviewed-by: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--snip--
