Quoting Claudio Imbrenda (2023-11-06 17:53:16) > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 13:50:58 +0100 > Nico Boehr <nrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > These comments do not follow the kernel-doc style, hence they should not > > start with /**. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > powerpc/emulator.c | 2 +- > > powerpc/spapr_hcall.c | 6 +++--- > > powerpc/spapr_vpa.c | 4 ++-- > > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/powerpc/emulator.c b/powerpc/emulator.c > > index 65ae4b65e655..39dd59645368 100644 > > --- a/powerpc/emulator.c > > +++ b/powerpc/emulator.c > > @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static void test_64bit(void) > > report_prefix_pop(); > > } > > > > -/** > > +/* > > * Test 'Load String Word Immediate' instruction > > */ > > this should have the name of the function first: > * test_lswi() - Test 'Load String ... > > (same for all the other functions here) Since none of these comments really follow kerneldoc style and are mostly static anyways, the idea was to convert them to non-kerneldoc style, by changing the comment from: /** to: /* But I am just as fine to make the comments proper kerneldoc style, if we see value in that.
